The Dec. 4 commentary by Dr. Valenta is misleading and does a disservice to your readers. The issue is not whether we as Catholics should accept refugees, but how we should do it.
When my parents came to the United States in 1910, there were laws that were strictly followed and which they gladly accepted to become citizens of this wonderful country. They went through Ellis Island, where they were carefully checked for diseases. If they were infected, they were either sent home or quarantined until they were well. They also presented valid documents that showed who they were, where they came from and other vital information.
This was and still is the responsibility of our government to protect innocent citizens from harm. This was something citizens could not do for themselves. Only government could do it. After my parents were here in this country for five years, they applied for and received citizenship, which included the ability to vote if they had been good citizens during their trial period.
Since they were German-speaking people, they settled in parts of the country where German was commonly spoken and where Mass was said in German and English. They became assimilated into American society and raised good families. They and others of every nationality were the immigrants who made this country great.
These are more dangerous times than years ago. Rather than just screening for infectious diseases, our government now must protect its citizens from radical Islamic terrorists and known thugs who intend to kill innocent people. This is not "misinformation" or "unfounded fears." Yet the government does virtually nothing to protect us.
Common sense tells us that all immigrants – from Mexico, Syria or anywhere – need to go through a screening and quota process that is more effective than what we have today. It is not anti-Catholic or non-Christian to ask for this kind of protection. Catholics should not have any feelings of guilt about this.
Again, the issue is not whether we as Catholics should accept refugees, but how we should do it. Let's do it with some common sense, determination and compassion, as was done years ago... and which worked.
— Edward J. Klein lives in Hendersonville.
I agree with Dr. Valenta's Dec. 4 commentary on welcoming Syrian refugees.
The refugees are fleeing evil and are searching for something else. This is a perfect opportunity for Christians to show the love of Jesus to these poor people. They are coming to us. It reminds me of John 4:34, when Jesus sees the crowd coming to Him and He tells His disciples "the fields are ripe for harvest." We have a chance to "reap" a harvest.
These refugees have probably heard of Jesus. But the Jesus of the Koran is not the Savior who died on the cross for the sins of the world and defeated death with His resurrection. In Islam, Jesus was not the Son of God.
I realize this is tricky and we must use caution, but with gentleness and love (1 Peter 3:15) we have a responsibility to tell them about the true Jesus. I have had the opportunity to evangelize Muslim friends, so I know that love is the most important approach – not fake love, but genuine love. It should be our desire for them to meet the real Jesus.
I welcome these people. I want them to experience the love of Christ. I would welcome a family of Muslim refugees into my home – not to preach to them, but to love them. If we love them we will soon tell them why we love them: because "He first loved us."
— Steve DeBord attends Good Shepherd Mission in King.